Archive for ‘Teaching & Learning Resources’

May 17, 2011

Gendered Ads Blogroll

by Preventionista

Blogroll from Gendered Ads & Global Consumer Culture

Below are the topics the IU students above were responding to.

_____________________________________________________________

FINAL BLOG TOPIC:

Compare and contrast corporate personhood in the film The Corporation/Bose and Lyons Critical Corporation Studies/ Klein’s No Logo with Chaudhuri’s “Gender and Advertisements: The Rhetoric of Globalisation.”

  • How is personhood understood in the film/Bose/Klein versus in the Chauduri article?
  • How specifically does normative gender figure into these constructions of subjectivity?

You do not have to write about the film AND Bose AND Klein, however, you must use at least one of the sources on corporate personhood to address the blog.

Resources you may use (min. of 2 required):

-The Corporation

-Bose and Lyons – “Toward a Critical Corporate Studies,” by Purnima Bose and Laura E. Lyons in (ed.) Purnima Bose and Laura E. Lyons, Cultural Critique and the Global Corporation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.

-Klein, Naomi. No Logo, London: HarperCollins

– Chaudhuri, Maitrayee, “Gender and Advertisements: The Rhetoric of Globalisation,” by Maitrayee,  Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 24, No. ¾ p 373-385, 2001.

Blog Due April 22, 2011 at 5 p.m.  in oncourse/assignments and two comments URL due in oncourse/assignments/blog 5/6 by Sunday April 24, 2011 at noon.  (Must be 900 words, use at least two critical terms, and must cite at least two readings from the course).

_________________________________________

Blog #4 Topic: Reflect on John Berger’s theory of the gaze (“men act and women appear”) and on Michel de Certeau’s practices of the everyday (“what is counted is what is used, not the ways of using”).

  • Your reflection must address how both writers identify and address power relationships within consumerism and consumption.
  • John Berger’s theory of the gaze argues that women are absent agency and femininity is immobilized.  How might we use de Certeau’s insights in “Making Do” to break apart or problematize notions of inert consumerism and passive femininity?

Bonus points: if you find a way to creatively incorporate videos/images/music as a part of this blog #4.  For example, you may find an artifact of popular culture as a catalyst to address this blog assignment.

Due Date: URL to blog Due in oncourse Friday March 25, 2011 by 5 p.m. / Two Comments submitted to oncourse by noon on Sunday March 27, 2011.

Texts you must use in this assignment:

  • “General Introduction and ‘Making Do’: Uses and Tactics,” by Michel de Certeau, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
  • Berger, John. Chapter 3, Ways of Seeing. Viking Press, New York, 1974

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Blog #3 Topic: How have feminist approached magazines as artifacts of culture? In other words, what methods, critiques, praises, concerns, etc. do feminists have for advertising and magazines? Can advertising and magazines generate emancipatory politics and analytical/political frameworks?

  • Blog Post #3 due Thursday February 17, 2011 at 5 p.m.
    (you must post URL in Oncourse/Assignments/Blog #3)
  • Two 250-word comments due Saturday, February 19, 2011 at noon.
    (You must post URLs in Oncourse/Assignments/Blog #3)

Requirements: You must answer this in 600-900 words not with opinion, but with a thorough analysis (as in “essay-style” writing). You must also use at least two critical terms in gender studies in your writing (cite and define in text or in footnotes).

Analysis is interpretation bolstered by evidence from the various texts we have read thus far. In other words, the tone of your writing should NOT be conversational. Therefore you will need to reference or cite work in text with the author and page number in parenthesis at the end of your sentence, like this (Berger, 12).

Up to five points of extra credit may be earned by bloggers who find a way to creatively include imagery or other forms of media in this post.

Texts you may use in this assignment:

  • Rooks, Noliwe M. Ladies’ Pages: African American Women’s Magazines and the Culture That Made Them. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2004
  • Friedan, Betty. “Chapter 2, The Happy Housewife Heroine” 33-68. The Feminine Mystique. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1963.
  • Meyewrowitz, Joanne (1993). “Beyond the Feminine Mystique: A Reassessment of Postwar Mass Culture, 1946-1958,” The Journal of American History, VOl. 79, No. 4 (Mar., 1993), pp. 1455-1482.
  • Thomas-Williams, Critical Terms in Gender Studies, accessed January 27, 2011: http://g205atiu.wordpress.com/critical-terms/

_____________________________________________________

Blog Assignment #2 / Two Comments

Blog #2 (600-900 words) due Thursday February 3, 2011 at 5 p.m. and Two 250-word comments due Friday, February 4, 2011 at noon.

Blog post assignment #2:  In the chapter focusing on the Fidji article, Berger lists seven methodological approaches to understanding or “decoding” advertising and commercials: semiotic, psychoanalytic, historical, political, myth/ritual, and feminist (p. 141, Third ed.).

In 600-900 words minimum, you should:

1.    Embed anywhere within your post a particular commercial or advertisement that you wish to analyze.

2.    Analyze the commercial or advertisement using one of the methods discussed in Berger.  Analysis is interpretation not summary.

3.    You are required to engage with Berger’s arguments, ideas, or research and two critical terms in gender studies as well as cite and define them ( in end notes or in-text).  See citations below.

Two Comments: Your two comments must be at least 250 words each.  Please try to visit numerous blogs, because while not everyone in class talks, everyone in this class does speak.  Find our course blogroll here to the right! —->

Here are the citations you are expected to use:

Berger, Arthur Asa. Ads, Fads and Consumer Culture, 2nd or 3rd Edition. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2003/2007

Thomas-Williams, Critical Terms in Gender Studies, accessed January 27, 2011: http://g205atiu.wordpress.com/critical-terms/

______________________________________________

December 24, 2010

New Course: G205 at IU

by Preventionista

I finally finished syllabus spring 2011v4 for fall.  I must say, the class sounds OFF THE CHAIN!!!

August 10, 2010

Borders of Desire: Sex and the Nation-State

by Preventionista
My fall course……….  It is going to be a challenge for
the students, but it will be fun.

COURSE DESCRIPTION

Borders of Desire: Sex and the Nation State is
an interdisciplinary and transnational survey of political and
academic debates that arose in the 1980s concurrent with the
“feminist sex wars,” including gay and lesbian activism, HIV/AIDS
activism, and black feminist and queer of color responses to
reproductive and immigration policies.  We will focus on the
implementation of U.S. federal and state laws that regulate
gendered behavior and shape normative understandings (and thus
practices) of sexuality.  We will examine how knowledge is
(re)produced globally through U.S. “development” efforts that often
focus upon minoritized bodies (through race, gender, and sexuality,
among other identity categories.  Not only will we be
introduced to the material effects of national regulations on the
human body through feminist and queer theory, but we will broaden
our discussion of to include the body politic as a site of
regulation.  The course will introduce students to approaches
to the regulation of gender and human desire from the fields of
history, philosophy, Native American and Indigenous Studies,
transnational feminist and post-structuralist theories. 
Ultimately, we will study “desire” as 1) a category of analysis and
2) a lived experience or daily practice to situate how ideas and
knowledge about race, sex, gender, and sexuality get circulated,
locally, nationally, and globally. 

 Some of our guiding questions and problematics
include:
  How is sexual desire, race, and gender
identity related to American citizenship?  How do human bodies
become disciplined through the nation as a “regulatory regime of
power” (Foucault)?  What is a nation-state?  How is the
nation a body?  How does pleasure surface in the relationship
between the desiring subject, the material body, and the
nation?  

 The required texts include* (please order
them early online to save money, although you will be able to buy
them at the bookstore):

  • Duggan, Lisa and Nan Hunter, Sex Wars:
    Sexual Dissent and Political Culture
    (10th Anniversary
    Edition), Routledge, July 24, 2006
  • Luibheid, Eithne. Entry Denied: Controlling Sexuality at
    the Border
    , Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 2002
  • Alexie, Sherman. Flight. New York: Black Cat,
    2007.

 *There are also readings posted in
oncourse/resources/readings.

Learning Outcomes:  In Borders of
Desire
we will explore how gender and sexuality are mutually
constitutive and how they intersect with and diverge from American
mass culture and nationalisms. 

  • Become familiar with how gender and sexuality is understood in
    U.S regulatory politics and understand sexual regulations in
    relation to identity categories, such as race, gender, and
    class.
  • Become conversant with major theoretical and critical
    approaches relevant to the study of gender and sexuality and use
    relevant concepts and terms in the study of gender studies in
    writing exercises.
  • Students will strengthen their oral and writing skills and
    demonstrate their ability to use critical analysis through
    successfully completing a variety of written assignments and in
    class presentations.
  • Students will be introduced to a range of library sources and
    writing resources.

G205 Syllabus – Subject to
Change

  • Reading marked with this symbol is located in
    oncourse/resources/readings.  I encourage you to bring digital
    items (laptop, netbook, etc.) to access the .pdf readings in class,
    but do not abuse this privilege.

 

What is sex/gender/sexuality?  How does one study
it?   

Week
1
    

 

 

 TU, 8/31/2010

Introductions, Syllabus, Groundings, Watch episode?

TH, 9/2/2010

  • Angier, Natalie. “Birds Do It. Bees Do It. People Seek The Keys
    to It.” The New York Times. April 10, 2007 (7 pages)

 

Hunter/Duggan, BOTH Introductions and Chapter 1,
"Contextualizing the Sexuality Debates: A Chronology 1966-2005,"
(ix-29)

 

What are some feminist approaches to sexuality (and why
feminism)?

Week 2

TU, 9/7/2010

Hunter/Duggan. Chapter 2, “Censorship in the name of Feminism,”
(p. 29-39) and Chapter 3, "False Promises: Feminist
Anti-pornography Legislation," (41-64)

TH 9/9/2010

  • McRobbie, Angela. “Feminism Undone? The Cultural Politics of
    Disarticulation.” (p. 24-53) In The Aftermath of Feminism:
    Gender, Culture, and Social Change.
    Los Angeles: Sage
    Publishing, 2009.

 

How does sexual pleasure and desire figure in light of
regulations on deviant sexualities? 

Week 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introducing "Queer"

TU 9/14/2010

Hunter/Duggan Chapter 12, "Making it Perfectly Queer,"
(149-163)

Hunter/Duggan Chapter 15, "The Discipline Problem: Queer Theory
Meets Lesbian and Gay History," (p. 185-196).

 

TH 9/16/2010

Hunter/Duggan Chapter 14, "Queering the State," (171-183)

  • “Straight Eye for the Straight Guy,” in Ferguson, and Marso
    (eds), W Stands for Women: How the George W. Bush Presidency
    Shaped a New Politics of Gender.
    Durham: Duke University
    Press, 2007, p. 65-86.

 

HOMEWORK Reflection Paper #1 Due online by Sat. 9/18/2010 at
noon
in oncourse assignments: One page single spaced critical
reflection on the week’s readings.  Take one issue, quote, or
aspect of the week’s readings and react to it in a way that is
analytical rather than emotional.  Use evidence rather than
opinion and please cite your sources.

 

How do human bodies become disciplined through the
nation as a “regulatory regime of power”
(Foucault)?    

Week 4

Survey of sexuality, pleasure, and desire in post-structural
and queer theory

TU 9/21/2010

  • Foucault, Michel, “Objective,” and “Method,” in The Deployment
    of Sexuality, The History of Sexuality: an Introduction, Volume
    1.
    New York: Vintage Books, 1978.

 

TH 9/23/2010

  • Foucault, Michel. “17 March, 1976,” (p.239-263). Society
    Must Be Defended: lectures at the College de France 1975-1976.

    New York: Picador Press, 1997

 

Week 5

TU 9/27/2010

  • Gayle Rubin, excerpts,  “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical
    Theory of the Politics of Sexuality.”  Pleasure and
    Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality
    . Edited by Carole S. Vance.
    London: Pandora, 1984. pp. 267-319.
  • Butler, Judith. “Gender Regulations,” in Undoing
    Gender
    . New York: Routledge, 2004, p. 40-56.

 

TH 9/30/2010

TBA, catch up  

HOMEWORK Reflection Paper #2 Due online by Sat. 10/2/2010 at
noon
in oncourse assignments: One page single spaced critical
reflection on the week’s readings.  Take one issue, quote, or
aspect of the week’s readings and react to it in a way that is
analytical rather than emotional.  Use evidence rather than
opinion and please cite your sources.

 

 What is a nation-state?  How is the nation a
body? Where does gender fit in?

Week 6

TU 10/4/2010

  • Rosen, Deborah A. Chapter 6, “State Citizenship by Legislative
    Action,” (p. 155-179) American Indians and State Law:
    Sovereignty, Race, and Citizenship, 1790-1880.
    Lincoln, Neb.:
    University of Nebraska Press, 2007.

TH 10/7/2010

Luibheid, Eithne. Introduction and Chapter 1 (ix-30), Entry
Denied: Controlling Sexuality at the Border

 

How do pleasure and desire surface in light of
regulations on deviant identities and sexualities?

Week 7

TU 10/12/2010

Luibheid, Eithne. Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 (31-76), Entry
Denied: Controlling Sexuality at the Border

 

TH 10/14/2010

  • Allison, Dorothy. “Public Silence, Private Terror,” (103-114)
    in (ed.) Carole S. Vance, Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female
    Sexuality
    . Winchester, MA: Routledge, 1984.
  • Bowers v Hardwick Decision or ->to hear the argument

    http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1985/1985_85_140/argument
  • Lawrence v. Texas Summaries (4 pages, 2 pdfs)
  • Lawrence v. Texas Decision (9 pages)

Upcoming due date: Short Essay #1, Due October 26, 2010, by 5
p.m. through oncourse/assignments/short essay #1

Week 8

TU 10/19/2010

Hunter/Duggan, Chapter 6, 7,  "Banned in the U.S.A.: What
the Hardwick Ruling Will Mean," "Life After Hardwick," (77-98 and
119-136), Sex Wars: Sexual Dissent and Political
Culture

 

TH 10/21/2010

Hunter/Duggan, Chapter 10, "Identity, Speech and
Equality,"  and Chapter 16, "Lawrence v. Texas as Law
and Culture," (p. 197-209), Sex Wars: Sexual Dissent and
Political Culture

 

Week 9

 TU 10/26/2010

  • Ruskola, Teemu.  "Gay Rights versus Queer Theory: What is
    Left of Sodomy After Lawrence v. Texas?" Social Text
    84-85, Vol 23, Nos. 3-4, Fall-Winter, 2005.

TH 10/28/2010

Female Masculinity and Rape as a Form of State
Violence/Control over Sexuality

Luibheid, Eithne.  Chapters 4-5 (77-136).

Luibheid – Conclusion

Week 10

How is sexual desire, race, and gender identity related
to American citizenship?

 Revisiting our central questions through CASE
STUDIES

TU 11/2/2010

 Sherman Alexie, Flight, Chapters 1-10

TH 11/4/2010

Sherman Alexie, Flight, Chapters 11-20

 

“MIDTERM” – Short Essay #1 Due Saturday
11/6/2010

(Pick one of the central questions under investigation
during the first eight weeks to answer in 2-3 pages, ds, times new
roman, default margins.  You must use at least two sources
from class and use proper citations.)

 

Week 11

HIV/AIDS – Intersections of Race, Gender,
Sexuality

TU 11/9/2010

  • Hammonds, Evelynn .  “Black (W)holes and the Geometry of
    Black Female Sexuality,” Feminism Meets Queer Theory
    Edited by Elizabeth Weed & Naomi Schor (Bloomington: Indiana
    University, 1997)
  • Brier, Jennifer. “The Immigrant infection: Images of Race,
    Nation, and Contagion in the Public Debates on AIDS and
    Immigration,” in Allida M. Black, (Ed.), Modern American Queer
    History
    . Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001

TH 11/11/2010

  • Brier, Jennifer.  “Locating Lesbian and Feminist Responses
    to AIDS, 1982-1984,” Women’s Studies Quarterly; Spring
    2007; 35, 1/2; p. 234-248.
  • Cohen, Cathy J. “Contested Membership: Black Gay identities and
    the Politics of AIDS,” from The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS
    and the Breakdown of Black Politics,
    Chicago: University of
    Chicago Press, 1999, pp. 46-60.

Reminder due date: Final Short Essay due in
oncourse/assignments/final on 12/10/2010 by 5 p.m.

Week 12

 Population and Reproduction /
Revisiting Nation Making

TU 11/16/2010

  • Smith, Andrea. Better dead than pregnant: The
    colonization of Native Women’s Reproductive Health,” Chapter 4,
    Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide.
    Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press, 2005.
  • Smith, Andrea. “Ch. 1, Sexual Violence as a Tool of Genocide,”
    (p. 7-54) in Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian
    Genocide
    . Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2005.

TH 11/18/2010

  • Roberts, Dorothy, “From Norplant to the Contraceptive Vaccine:
    The New Frontier of Population Control,” (p. 104-150), in
    Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and

Week 13

TU 11/23/2010

  • Briggs, Laura. “Chapter 5, The Politics of Sterilization,
    1937-1974, in  Reproducing Empire: Race, Sex, Science, and
    U.S. Imperialism in Puerto Rico
    . Berkeley: University of
    California Press, 2002.

 TH 11/25/2010

Screening:  La Operacion 1982 / 40 minutes – This
documentary brings to the foreground the problem of widespread
sterilization among Puerto Rican women through the use of personal
testimony, newsreels, and government propaganda excerpts. The
procedure is so common that more than one-third of all Puerto Rican
women of childbearing age have been sterilized. Begun in the 1930’s
as a means of curbing the surplus population, it continues to be
reinforced politically and socially in the Puerto Rican
communities.

How does gender and pleasure surface in the relationship
between the desiring subject, the material body, and the
nation?

 

Week 14

TU 11/30/2010

  • Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt, "Introduction," Friction: An
    Ethnography of Global Connection
    . Princeton University Press,
    2005.
  • Mohanty, Chandra.  “Under Western Eyes: Feminist
    Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” (pp. 17-42) Feminisms
    Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing
    Solidarity
    .  2003/2006.

 TH 12/2/2010

  • Stacy Leigh Pigg and Vincanne Adams, “Introduction: The Moral
    Object of Sex,” Sex in Development: Science, Sexuality, and
    Morality in Global Perspective.
    Edited by Vincanne Adams and
    Stacy Leigh Pigg, Durham: Duke University Press, 2005,
    pp.1-38.
  • Stacy Leigh Pigg, “Globalizing the Facts of Life,” Sex in
    Development: Science, Sexuality, and Morality in Global
    Perspective.
    Edited by Vincanne Adams and Stacy Leigh Pigg,
    Durham: Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 39-66.

Week 15

TU 12/7/2010

Final papers due Friday this week – no
final exam

  • Brennan, Denise.  “Performing Love,” (p. 91-115) in
    What’s Love Got to Do with It? Transnational Desires and Sex
    Tourism in the Dominican Republic
    .  Durham: Duke
    University Press, 2004.
  • Salzinger, Leslie, “Chapter 1 Ways of Seeing, Chapter 2,
    Producing Women: Femininity on the Line,” Genders in
    Production: Making Workers in Mexico’s Global Factories.

    Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.

TH 12/9/2010

  • Mohanty, Chandra, Under Western Eyes, Revisited, parts 1 and
    2.

FINAL Papers Due Friday 12/10/2010- Short Essay #2 Due
(Pick one of the central questions under investigation during the
semester to investigate in 4-5 pages, ds, times new roman, default
margins.  You must use at least 4 sources from class and use
proper citations.)

 

You must approve comments.

Comments must be approved by the author.

My fall course……….  It is going to be a challenge forthe students, but it will be fun.

COURSE DESCRIPTION

Borders of Desire: Sex and the Nation State
isan interdisciplinary and transnational survey of political
andacademic debates that arose in the 1980s concurrent with the“feminist
sex wars,” including gay and lesbian activism, HIV/AIDSactivism, and
black feminist and queer of color responses toreproductive and
immigration policies.  We will focus on theimplementation of U.S.
federal and state laws that regulategendered behavior and shape
normative understandings (and thuspractices) of sexuality.  We will
examine how knowledge is(re)produced globally through U.S. “development”
efforts that oftenfocus upon minoritized bodies (through race, gender,
and sexuality,among other identity categories.  Not only will we
beintroduced to the material effects of national regulations on thehuman
body through feminist and queer theory, but we will broadenour
discussion of to include the body politic as a site ofregulation.  The
course will introduce students to approachesto the regulation of gender
and human desire from the fields ofhistory, philosophy, Native American
and Indigenous Studies,transnational feminist and post-structuralist
theories. Ultimately, we will study “desire” as 1) a category of
analysis and2) a lived experience or daily practice to situate how ideas
andknowledge about race, sex, gender, and sexuality get
circulated,locally, nationally, and globally. 

 Some of our guiding questions and problematicsinclude: 
How is sexual desire, race, and genderidentity related to American
citizenship?  How do human bodiesbecome disciplined through the nation
as a “regulatory regime ofpower” (Foucault)?  What is a nation-state? 
How is thenation a body?  How does pleasure surface in the
relationshipbetween the desiring subject, the material body, and
thenation?  

 The required texts include* (please orderthem early online to save money, although you will be able to buythem at the bookstore):

  • Duggan, Lisa and Nan Hunter, Sex Wars:Sexual Dissent and Political Culture (10th AnniversaryEdition), Routledge, July 24, 2006
  • Luibheid, Eithne. Entry Denied: Controlling Sexuality atthe Border, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 2002
  • Alexie, Sherman. Flight. New York: Black Cat,2007.

 *There are also readings posted inoncourse/resources/readings.

Learning Outcomes:  In Borders ofDesire
we will explore how gender and sexuality are mutuallyconstitutive and
how they intersect with and diverge from Americanmass culture and
nationalisms. 

  • Become familiar with how gender and sexuality
    is understood inU.S regulatory politics and understand sexual
    regulations inrelation to identity categories, such as race, gender,
    andclass.
  • Become conversant with major theoretical and
    criticalapproaches relevant to the study of gender and sexuality and
    userelevant concepts and terms in the study of gender studies inwriting
    exercises.
  • Students will strengthen their oral and writing
    skills anddemonstrate their ability to use critical analysis
    throughsuccessfully completing a variety of written assignments and
    inclass presentations.
  • Students will be introduced to a range of library sources andwriting resources.

G205 Syllabus – Subject toChange

  • Reading
    marked with this symbol is located inoncourse/resources/readings.  I
    encourage you to bring digitalitems (laptop, netbook, etc.) to access
    the .pdf readings in class,but do not abuse this privilege.

 

What is sex/gender/sexuality?  How does one studyit?   

Week1    

 

 

 TU, 8/31/2010

Introductions, Syllabus, Groundings, Watch episode?

TH, 9/2/2010

  • Angier, Natalie. “Birds Do It. Bees Do It. People Seek The Keysto It.” The New York Times. April 10, 2007 (7 pages)

 

Hunter/Duggan, BOTH Introductions and Chapter 1,"Contextualizing the Sexuality Debates: A Chronology 1966-2005,"(ix-29)

 

What are some feminist approaches to sexuality (and whyfeminism)?

Week 2

 

 

 

 

 

TU, 9/7/2010

Hunter/Duggan.
Chapter 2, “Censorship in the name of Feminism,”(p. 29-39) and Chapter
3, "False Promises: FeministAnti-pornography Legislation," (41-64)

TH 9/9/2010

  • McRobbie, Angela. “Feminism Undone? The Cultural Politics ofDisarticulation.” (p. 24-53) In The Aftermath of Feminism:Gender, Culture, and Social Change. Los Angeles: SagePublishing, 2009.

 

How does sexual pleasure and desire figure in light ofregulations on deviant sexualities? 

Week 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introducing "Queer"

TU 9/14/2010

Hunter/Duggan Chapter 12, "Making it Perfectly Queer,"(149-163)

Hunter/Duggan Chapter 15, "The Discipline Problem: Queer TheoryMeets Lesbian and Gay History," (p. 185-196).

 

TH 9/16/2010

Hunter/Duggan Chapter 14, "Queering the State," (171-183)

  • “Straight Eye for the Straight Guy,” in Ferguson, and Marso(eds), W Stands for Women: How the George W. Bush PresidencyShaped a New Politics of Gender. Durham: Duke UniversityPress, 2007, p. 65-86.

 

HOMEWORK Reflection Paper #1 Due online by Sat. 9/18/2010 atnoon
in oncourse assignments: One page single spaced criticalreflection on
the week’s readings.  Take one issue, quote, oraspect of the week’s
readings and react to it in a way that isanalytical rather than
emotional.  Use evidence rather thanopinion and please cite your
sources.

 

How do human bodies become disciplined through thenation as a “regulatory regime of power”(Foucault)?    

Week 4

Survey of sexuality, pleasure, and desire in post-structuraland queer theory

TU 9/21/2010

  • Foucault, Michel, “Objective,” and “Method,” in The Deploymentof Sexuality, The History of Sexuality: an Introduction, Volume1. New York: Vintage Books, 1978.

 

TH 9/23/2010

  • Foucault, Michel. “17 March, 1976,” (p.239-263). SocietyMust Be Defended: lectures at the College de France 1975-1976.New York: Picador Press, 1997

 

Week 5

TU 9/27/2010

  • Gayle Rubin, excerpts,  “Thinking Sex: Notes for a RadicalTheory of the Politics of Sexuality.”  Pleasure andDanger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Edited by Carole S. Vance.London: Pandora, 1984. pp. 267-319.
  • Butler, Judith. “Gender Regulations,” in UndoingGender. New York: Routledge, 2004, p. 40-56.

 

TH 9/30/2010

TBA, catch up  

HOMEWORK Reflection Paper #2 Due online by Sat. 10/2/2010 atnoon
in oncourse assignments: One page single spaced criticalreflection on
the week’s readings.  Take one issue, quote, oraspect of the week’s
readings and react to it in a way that isanalytical rather than
emotional.  Use evidence rather thanopinion and please cite your
sources.

 

 What is a nation-state?  How is the nation abody? Where does gender fit in?

Week 6

TU 10/4/2010

  • Rosen, Deborah A. Chapter 6, “State Citizenship by LegislativeAction,” (p. 155-179) American Indians and State Law:Sovereignty, Race, and Citizenship, 1790-1880. Lincoln, Neb.:University of Nebraska Press, 2007.

TH 10/7/2010

Luibheid, Eithne. Introduction and Chapter 1 (ix-30), EntryDenied: Controlling Sexuality at the Border

 

How do pleasure and desire surface in light ofregulations on deviant identities and sexualities?

Week 7

TU 10/12/2010

Luibheid, Eithne. Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 (31-76), EntryDenied: Controlling Sexuality at the Border

 

TH 10/14/2010

  • Allison, Dorothy. “Public Silence, Private Terror,” (103-114)in (ed.) Carole S. Vance, Pleasure and Danger: Exploring FemaleSexuality. Winchester, MA: Routledge, 1984.
  • Bowers v Hardwick Decision or ->to hear the argumenthttp://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1985/1985_85_140/argument
  • Lawrence v. Texas Summaries (4 pages, 2 pdfs)
  • Lawrence v. Texas Decision (9 pages)

Upcoming due date: Short Essay #1, Due October 26, 2010, by 5p.m. through oncourse/assignments/short essay #1

Week 8

TU 10/19/2010

Hunter/Duggan,
Chapter 6, 7,  "Banned in the U.S.A.: Whatthe Hardwick Ruling Will
Mean," "Life After Hardwick," (77-98 and119-136), Sex Wars: Sexual Dissent and PoliticalCulture

 

TH 10/21/2010

Hunter/Duggan, Chapter 10, "Identity, Speech andEquality,"  and Chapter 16, "Lawrence v. Texas as Lawand Culture," (p. 197-209), Sex Wars: Sexual Dissent andPolitical Culture

 

Week 9

 TU 10/26/2010

  • Ruskola, Teemu.  "Gay Rights versus Queer Theory: What isLeft of Sodomy After Lawrence v. Texas?" Social Text84-85, Vol 23, Nos. 3-4, Fall-Winter, 2005.

TH 10/28/2010

Female Masculinity and Rape as a Form of StateViolence/Control over Sexuality

Luibheid, Eithne.  Chapters 4-5 (77-136).

Luibheid – Conclusion

Week 10

How is sexual desire, race, and gender identity relatedto American citizenship?

 Revisiting our central questions through CASESTUDIES

TU 11/2/2010

 Sherman Alexie, Flight, Chapters 1-10

TH 11/4/2010

Sherman Alexie, Flight, Chapters 11-20

 

“MIDTERM” – Short Essay #1 Due Saturday11/6/2010

(Pick
one of the central questions under investigationduring the first eight
weeks to answer in 2-3 pages, ds, times newroman, default margins.  You
must use at least two sourcesfrom class and use proper citations.)

 

Week 11

HIV/AIDS – Intersections of Race, Gender,Sexuality

TU 11/9/2010

  • Hammonds, Evelynn .  “Black (W)holes and the Geometry ofBlack Female Sexuality,” Feminism Meets Queer TheoryEdited by Elizabeth Weed & Naomi Schor (Bloomington: IndianaUniversity, 1997)
  • Brier,
    Jennifer. “The Immigrant infection: Images of Race,Nation, and
    Contagion in the Public Debates on AIDS andImmigration,” in Allida M.
    Black, (Ed.), Modern American QueerHistory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001

TH 11/11/2010

  • Brier, Jennifer.  “Locating Lesbian and Feminist Responsesto AIDS, 1982-1984,” Women’s Studies Quarterly; Spring2007; 35, 1/2; p. 234-248.
  • Cohen, Cathy J. “Contested Membership: Black Gay identities andthe Politics of AIDS,” from The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDSand the Breakdown of Black Politics, Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1999, pp. 46-60.

Reminder due date: Final Short Essay due inoncourse/assignments/final on 12/10/2010 by 5 p.m.

Week 12

 Population and Reproduction /Revisiting Nation Making

TU 11/16/2010

  • Smith, Andrea. Better dead than pregnant: Thecolonization of Native Women’s Reproductive Health,” Chapter 4,Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide.Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press, 2005.
  • Smith, Andrea. “Ch. 1, Sexual Violence as a Tool of Genocide,”(p. 7-54) in Conquest: Sexual Violence and American IndianGenocide. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2005.

TH 11/18/2010

  • Roberts, Dorothy, “From Norplant to the Contraceptive Vaccine:The New Frontier of Population Control,” (p. 104-150), inKilling the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and

Week 13

TU 11/23/2010

  • Briggs, Laura. “Chapter 5, The Politics of Sterilization,1937-1974, in  Reproducing Empire: Race, Sex, Science, andU.S. Imperialism in Puerto Rico. Berkeley: University ofCalifornia Press, 2002.

 TH 11/25/2010

Screening:  La Operacion
1982 / 40 minutes – Thisdocumentary brings to the foreground the
problem of widespreadsterilization among Puerto Rican women through the
use of personaltestimony, newsreels, and government propaganda excerpts.
Theprocedure is so common that more than one-third of all Puerto
Ricanwomen of childbearing age have been sterilized. Begun in the
1930’sas a means of curbing the surplus population, it continues to
bereinforced politically and socially in the Puerto Ricancommunities.

How does gender and pleasure surface in the relationshipbetween the desiring subject, the material body, and thenation?

 

Week 14

TU 11/30/2010

  • Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt, "Introduction," Friction: AnEthnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press,2005.
  • Mohanty, Chandra.  “Under Western Eyes: FeministScholarship and Colonial Discourses.” (pp. 17-42) FeminismsWithout Borders: Decolonizing Theory, PracticingSolidarity.  2003/2006.

 TH 12/2/2010

  • Stacy Leigh Pigg and Vincanne Adams, “Introduction: The MoralObject of Sex,” Sex in Development: Science, Sexuality, andMorality in Global Perspective. Edited by Vincanne Adams andStacy Leigh Pigg, Durham: Duke University Press, 2005,pp.1-38.
  • Stacy Leigh Pigg, “Globalizing the Facts of Life,” Sex inDevelopment: Science, Sexuality, and Morality in GlobalPerspective. Edited by Vincanne Adams and Stacy Leigh Pigg,Durham: Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 39-66.

Week 15

TU 12/7/2010

Final papers due Friday this week – nofinal exam

  • Brennan, Denise.  “Performing Love,” (p. 91-115) inWhat’s Love Got to Do with It? Transnational Desires and SexTourism in the Dominican Republic.  Durham: DukeUniversity Press, 2004.
  • Salzinger, Leslie, “Chapter 1 Ways of Seeing, Chapter 2,Producing Women: Femininity on the Line,” Genders inProduction: Making Workers in Mexico’s Global Factories.Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.

TH 12/9/2010

  • Mohanty, Chandra, Under Western Eyes, Revisited, parts 1 and2.

FINAL
Papers Due Friday 12/10/2010- Short Essay #2 Due(Pick one of the
central questions under investigation during thesemester to investigate
in 4-5 pages, ds, times new roman, defaultmargins.  You must use at
least 4 sources from class and useproper citations.)

 

Borders of Desire: Sex and the Nation-State

Loading…

How does this journal post violate our terms of service?

Description (required)

I saw an "ah-ha" moment…..I am a teacher!

Jul. 20

I teach G101: Gender, Culture, and Society (this is my fourth
time) and have experienced–for the first time as a
teacher—students having an "ah-ha moment."  The “I get it
moment.”  I can’t even fully express how amazing that
feels.  For the past week we have been reading and discussing
CJ Pascoe’s "Dude, You’re a Fag: Sexuality and Masculinity in High
School." 

Pascoe’s book illustrates that gender and sexuality are not
stable identities, but rather they are both processes, categories
of analysis, and constructed through endless repetition. 
Judith Butler calls the repeated citation of gender norms
“performativity.”  Pascoe’s book illustrates gender as a
process, which she argues is “gender maneuvering.”

My colleagues have had mixed experiences with teaching this
book, from refusal to engage to anger, but for some reason my
students really understood something new about gender and sexuality
in relation to themselves.  (I have an astounding 18 men /7
women ratio in class—usually more women than men take GS
courses). 

The room lit up and people were engaging each other.  If
you teach then you know that there are 3-5 people who will usually
discuss anything with you and its like pulling teeth to get others
to contribute.  This past week a record 12 of the 27 spoke
voluntarily and vociferously the entire 2.5 hours!   I saw
light bulbs going on…bodies leaning forward…heads nodding…
people could not wait to speak next.

Plus, it is just really entertaining to listen to young people
talking about "fag discourse" in relation to the South Park’s
episode….. http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/251889.  
FYI, my student says:  "we started at the 7:15 point and
watched till about the 13th minute, but I would recommend watching
the whole episode because it’s pretty entertaining and it’s a
perfect example of ‘fag discourse.’"  Now, I would not agree
that it is a perfect illustration of the theory, but it is
definitely worth spending some time unpacking….. 

This is really momentous for me to be on the other end of this
experience for a young person, because I remember when it happened
to me and it changed my life for forever.

This moment must be fostered for students.  The vibe in the
classroom is very relaxed and I know everyone’s name and call them
by it every session.  I want the students to know that I see
them, but this also means the students learn to look at each other
as people.  This is good pedagogy for getting a group of
pretty random people to really open up and think together about a
common piece of writing/theory.  What I am saying is that when
you "know" who you are talking to it helps to make the environment
feel safe.  Students are more open, emotionally and
intellectually, to learn about the instability and precariousness
of subjectivity.

My students asked me the pivotal question:  “What do we
do?  What are we supposed to do?”  And I felt like
weeping with happiness.  I had an “ah-ha” moment, too: I am a
teacher.

You must approve comments.

Comments must be approved by the author.

I
teach G101: Gender, Culture, and Society (this is my fourthtime) and
have experienced–for the first time as ateacher—students having an
"ah-ha moment."  The “I get itmoment.”  I can’t even fully express how
amazing thatfeels.  For the past week we have been reading and
discussingCJ Pascoe’s "Dude, You’re a Fag: Sexuality and Masculinity in
HighSchool." 

Pascoe’s book illustrates that gender and sexuality
are notstable identities, but rather they are both processes,
categoriesof analysis, and constructed through endless
repetition. Judith Butler calls the repeated citation of gender
norms“performativity.”  Pascoe’s book illustrates gender as aprocess,
which she argues is “gender maneuvering.”

My colleagues have had
mixed experiences with teaching thisbook, from refusal to engage to
anger, but for some reason mystudents really understood something new
about gender and sexualityin relation to themselves.  (I have an
astounding 18 men /7women ratio in class—usually more women than men
take GScourses). 

The room lit up and people were engaging each
other.  Ifyou teach then you know that there are 3-5 people who will
usuallydiscuss anything with you and its like pulling teeth to get
othersto contribute.  This past week a record 12 of the 27
spokevoluntarily and vociferously the entire 2.5 hours!   I sawlight
bulbs going on…bodies leaning forward…heads nodding…people could
not wait to speak next.

Plus, it is just really entertaining to
listen to young peopletalking about "fag discourse" in relation to the
South Park’sepisode….. http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/251889.  FYI,
my student says:  "we started at the 7:15 point andwatched till about
the 13th minute, but I would recommend watchingthe whole episode because
it’s pretty entertaining and it’s aperfect example of ‘fag
discourse.’"  Now, I would not agreethat it is a perfect illustration of
the theory, but it isdefinitely worth spending some time unpacking….. 

This
is really momentous for me to be on the other end of thisexperience for
a young person, because I remember when it happenedto me and it changed
my life for forever.

This moment must be fostered for students. 
The vibe in theclassroom is very relaxed and I know everyone’s name and
call themby it every session.  I want the students to know that I
seethem, but this also means the students learn to look at each otheras
people.  This is good pedagogy for getting a group ofpretty random
people to really open up and think together about acommon piece of
writing/theory.  What I am saying is that whenyou "know" who you are
talking to it helps to make the environmentfeel safe.  Students are more
open, emotionally andintellectually, to learn about the instability and
precariousnessof subjectivity.

My students asked me the pivotal
question:  “What do wedo?  What are we supposed to do?”  And I felt
likeweeping with happiness.  I had an “ah-ha” moment, too: I am
ateacher.

I saw an "ah-ha" moment…..I am a teacher!

Loading…

How does this journal post violate our terms of service?

Description (required)

http://bhr.off-the-chain.org/

Jul. 9

Check out
this entry
, which will take you to a clip of a young man who
lost a bet and went to his prom dressed like a woman.  This
version of male femininity was not "read" as a threat, but
Escboar’s feminine masculinity was–after three days and when he
had permission.  What is really at stake in the school
district’s dress code to prevent feminine gender expression in
men?

Jonathon
Escobar powerpoint

BHR teaches students that "the gender box" is foundational
to power and privilege
and demonstrates that "the gender box"
is held in place through a variety of means,
including racism, sexism, classism, and
homophobia
.  Julia Serano, a trans biologist in
Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the
Scapegoating of Femininity (2007)
, breaks down sexism in a
really interesting way that is helpful to unpack the heterosexual
imperative of the gender box. 

Serano argues that
transphobia
and
homophobia
 (see entry on Lawrence King) are rooted
in "oppositional sexism, which is the
belief that female and male are rigid, mutually exclusive
categories, each possessing a unique and nonoverlapping set of
attributes, aptitudes, and desires
(13)."    What is being banned in Escobar’s
case is the expression of male femininity.

Traditional sexism is the "belief that
maleness and masculinity are superior to femaleness and femininity
(14)," according to Serano.  Finally, Serano wants to
make it clear–it is her manifesto–that
"misogyny is the tendancy to dismiss and
deride femaleness and femininity."

Serano argues that transmisogyny explains the jokes "at the expense
of trans people" (like Micah’s prom above), but she goes on to
argue that the majority of violence directed at trans people is
directed at trans women.  Serano argues that "men" who
wear women’s clothing are pathologized, while the reverse is not
true for women who wear men’s clothes: it is
trans-misogyny.

More on prohibition of male
femininity……………………..

Morehouse, an all male traditionally black college (also in
Georgia), recently
added a prohibition of "feminine attire."
  The code
specifically reads "no wearing of clothing usually worn by women
(dresses, tops, tunics,purses, pumps, etc.) on the Morehouse campus
or at college-sponsoredevents."